<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Deutsch's Diatribe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattdeutsch.com/blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattdeutsch.com/blogs</link>
	<description>Conquering the World . . . One Blog at a Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 08:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; Deutsch's Diatribe 2010 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>matt@mattdeutsch.com (Deutsch's Diatribe)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>matt@mattdeutsch.com (Deutsch's Diatribe)</webMaster>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Conquering the World . . . One Blog at a Time</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>Deutsch's Diatribe</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Deutsch's Diatribe</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>matt@mattdeutsch.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://mattdeutsch.com/blogs/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Presenting the Movie Rating System for the &#8216;Diatribe&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://mattdeutsch.com/blogs/2012/01/01/presenting-the-movie-rating-system-for-the-diatribe/</link>
		<comments>http://mattdeutsch.com/blogs/2012/01/01/presenting-the-movie-rating-system-for-the-diatribe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Deutsch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA['Diatribe' at the Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattdeutsch.com/blogs/?p=462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ikoniOne of the things that I’ll be doing here at the &#8220;Diatribe&#8221; is writing movie reviews.  For that purpose, I’ve devised the following movie rating system. I’m not a big fan of the star system (one star, two stars, etc.). I’d rather use the system that Entertainment Weekly uses—namely letter grades. However, they don’t take [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font style="position: absolute;overflow: hidden;height: 0;width: 0"><a href="http://xn--h1aafme.net/">ikoni</a></font>One of the things that I’ll be doing here at the &#8220;Diatribe&#8221; is writing movie reviews.  For that purpose, I’ve devised the following movie rating system.</p>
<p>I’m not a big fan of the star system (one star, two stars, etc.). I’d rather use the system that <em>Entertainment Weekly</em> uses—<strong>namely letter grades</strong>. However, they don’t take it as far as I’m going to take it, as you can plainly see below:</p>
<p><strong>A+:</strong> Should be watched by everybody, regardless of which genre of movies they normally enjoy.</p>
<p><strong>A:</strong> Nearly a perfect movie, but whatever flaw (or flaws) it might have should be overlooked for the greater good.</p>
<p><strong>A-:</strong> Exceptionally well done and is still a movie that could be conceivably enjoyed by everyone who watches it.</p>
<p><strong>B+:</strong> Fans of the genre should definitely watch it, and those who generally don’t watch movies of this type might like it, too.</p>
<p><strong>B:</strong> A solid offering on nearly all levels, but lacks that certain something that would have taken it to the next level.</p>
<p><strong>B-:</strong> Has potential, but falls short of that potential for whatever reason. Could still be entertaining, though, so you might not want to pass it up.</p>
<p><strong>C+:</strong> Delivers a bit more than your average movie, but ultimately its beauty (or lack thereof) will be in the eye of the beholder.</p>
<p><strong>C:</strong> As average as average can be. You can take it . . . or leave it.</p>
<p><strong>C-:</strong> Has its fingers hanging on the edge of watch-able, but depending on who you are, it might not fall into that category.</p>
<p><strong>D+:</strong> Has the smallest of redeeming qualities . . . but damned if I know exactly what those are.</p>
<p><strong>D:</strong> It makes an effort, and quite frankly, that effort sucks quite a bit. However, it could be worse.</p>
<p><strong>D-:</strong> Consider this the first circle of movie hell, and you just bought a front row ticket.</p>
<p><strong>F+:</strong> Does almost all of the things that good movies don’t do, which is why you might stop watching it halfway through.</p>
<p><strong>F:</strong> Flat-lined, all the way. The patient is dead, and your interest in this movie should be, too.</p>
<p><strong>F-:</strong> You’ve already wasted too much time on this movie by reading this review. Forget it exists.</p>
<p>Feel free to refer to this rating system when I post movie reviews. I’ll also include a link to this blog post with each review. So sit back, relax, and let’s watch some movies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattdeutsch.com/blogs/2012/01/01/presenting-the-movie-rating-system-for-the-diatribe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

